<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Theresa Clay</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The systematic position of the Musophagi as indicated by their Mallophagan parasites</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ibis</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1947</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1947</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.phthiraptera.info/sites/phthiraptera.info/files/0544.pdf</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">89</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">654 - 656</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hopst parasite relations are discussed with respect to the five genera of Mallophaga parasitizing the Musophagi. i.e. Turacoeca, Menacanthus, Clayia, Splendoroffula and Cuclotogaster. Possible reasons given to explain the two genera are common to the Musophagi and Galli and that one on the Musophagi is closely related to one on the Galli are discussed. Posibilities listed include: Ancient straggling, convergence, discontinuous distribution, and relationships between the two host suborders.</style></notes><custom2><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pdf</style></custom2></record></records></xml>