<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Matthysse,John George</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Pendleton,R. F.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Padula,A.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Nielsen,G. R.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Controlling lice and chorioptic mange mites on dairy cattle</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journal of economic entomology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">animals</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cattle</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">insecticide</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lice/drug effects</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mites/drug effects</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1967</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1967</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://jee.oxfordjournals.org/content/60/6/1615.long</style></url></web-urls></urls><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">UNITED STATES</style></pub-location><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">60</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1615 - 1623</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">0022-0493</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Conventional high-gallonage, high-volume spraying of dairy cattle with 0.03% diazinon, 0.1% coumaphos, 0.1% carbaryl, or 0.1-0.5% Ciodrin&amp;reg; (alpha-methylbenzyl 3-hydroxycrotonate dimethyl phosphate) controlled cattle biting lice, Bovicola bovis (L.); long-nosed cattle lice, Linognathus vituli (L.); and short-nosed cattle lice, Haematopinus eurysternus (Nitzsch). Ciodrin and carbaryl were not as completely effective as diazinon and coumaphos when herds were sprayed only once. 0.125% rotenone plus 2.5% sulfur required 2 applications for adequate control. Concentrations of Ciodrin as low as 0.03-0.06% applied twice, were completely effective against the chorioptic mange mite, Chorioptes bovis (Hering), but not against lice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An electric mist blower was used to apply low-volume concentrates at 2-8 oz of mist/cow. Ciodrin emulsion, 1-2%, at 8 oz/cow, applied twice, completely controlled all the louse species previously mentioned as well as the chorioptic mange mite. In one of the 8 herds treated, a small number of the little blue louse, Solenopotes capillatus Enderlein, survived 6 weeks after the 2nd application. A similar application of 2% ronnel completely controlled 2 species of sucking lice. Rotenone, 0.5%, applied twice gave good but not complete louse control, and was not effective against the chorioptic mange mite. Ciodrin was tested also as a 2% solution in a livestock spray oil at 71-107 ml/cow and completely controlled cattle biting and sucking lice and chorioptic mange mites with 2 applications. Also effective was 83-150 ml/cow of 1 % Ciodrin plus 0.25% dichlorvos solution. Dichlorvos, 1%, alone was effective against all louse species but not the chorioptic mange mite. Preliminary experiments indicated that 2% trichlorfon, 2% coumaphos, and 1% fenthion were effective when applied as a low-volume mist.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Emulsions containing 8.3% Ruelene&amp;reg; (4-tert-butyl-2-chlorophenyl methyl methylphosphoramidate) or 5% fenthion, poured on the backs of cattle, reduced populations of the cattle biting louse and the long-nosed cattle louse. Two applications of Ruelene did not completely control the cattle biting louse.&lt;br /&gt;
	&amp;copy; 1967 Entomological Society of America&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">6</style></issue><notes><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">LR: 20031114; JID: 2985127R; 0 (Insecticides); ppublish</style></notes></record></records></xml>