<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Gerardo Domínguez-Peñafiel</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Consuelo Giménez-Pardo</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">María Isabel Gegúndez</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lourdes Lledó</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Prevalence of ectoparasitic arthropods on wild animals and cattle in the Las Merindades area (Burgos, Spain)</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Parasite</style></secondary-title><short-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Parasite</style></short-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">domestic animals</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ectoparasites</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">epidemiology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Spain</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Trichodectes mustelae</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">wild animal</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">08-2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">http://www.parasite-journal.org/10.1051/parasite/2011183251</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">18</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">251 - 260</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;This paper reports the prevalence of ectoparasitic arthropods in sampled groups of wild (n = 128; 16 species) and domestic (n = 69; 3 species) animals in the Las Merindades area of the Province of Burgos, Spain. The study revealed that wild animals were more infested and with a wider variety of ectoparasites than domestic animals. The parasitic prevalence was 67% for wild animals and 48% for livestock. In this way, 39% of animals were infected by ticks. Ixodes ricinus and Ixodes hexagonus were the most prevalent species whereas Dermacentor reticulatus showed affinity for the fox and wolf. The overall prevalence of parasitisation by fleas was 27%. Ctenophthalmus spp. showed the wider range host in wild animals, while Pulex irritans was the most frequent specie found. The parasitic prevalences by lice (Trichodectes melis, Trichodectes canis and Trichodectes mustelae) and by mite (Neotrombicula spp., Laelaps agilis and Sarcoptes scabiei) were 4% and 12%, respectively. In both cases only wild animals were found parasited.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;R&amp;eacute;sum&amp;eacute;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Cet article pr&amp;eacute;sente la pr&amp;eacute;valence des arthropodes ectoparasites dans des &amp;eacute;chantillons d&amp;rsquo;animaux sauvages (n = 128 ; 16 esp&amp;egrave;ces) et domestiques (n = 69 ; 3 esp&amp;egrave;ces) dans la r&amp;eacute;gion de Las Merindades de la province de Burgos, en Espagne. L&amp;rsquo;&amp;eacute;tude a r&amp;eacute;v&amp;eacute;l&amp;eacute; que les mammif&amp;egrave;res sauvages ont &amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute; plus infest&amp;eacute;s et ont &amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute; touch&amp;eacute;s par une plus grande vari&amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute; d&amp;rsquo;ectoparasites que les animaux domestiques. La pr&amp;eacute;valence parasitaire a &amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute; de 67 % pour les animaux sauvages et 48 % pour le b&amp;eacute;tail. Ainsi, 39 % de tous les animaux ont &amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute; infect&amp;eacute;s par les tiques. Ixodes ricinus et Ixodes hexagonus ont &amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute; les esp&amp;egrave;ces les plus r&amp;eacute;pandues, alors que Dermacentor reticulatus a montr&amp;eacute; une affinit&amp;eacute; pour le renard et le loup. La pr&amp;eacute;valence globale du parasitisme par les puces a &amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute; de 27 %. Ctenophtalmus spp a montr&amp;eacute; la plus large gamme d&amp;rsquo;h&amp;ocirc;tes chez les animaux sauvages, tandis que Pulex irritans a &amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute; l&amp;rsquo;esp&amp;egrave;ce la plus fr&amp;eacute;quemment trouv&amp;eacute;e. Les pr&amp;eacute;valences parasitaires par les poux (Trichodectes melis, Trichodectes canis et Trichodectes mustelae) et par les acariens (Neotrombicula spp., Laelaps agilis et Sarcoptes scabiei) ont &amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute; de 4 % et 12 %, respectivement. Dans les deux cas, seuls les animaux sauvages ont &amp;eacute;t&amp;eacute; trouv&amp;eacute;s parasit&amp;eacute;s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Mots cl&amp;eacute;s :&lt;/strong&gt; ectoparasites / animaux sauvages / animaux domestiques / &amp;eacute;pid&amp;eacute;miologie / Espagne&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">3</style></issue><work-type><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Open Access</style></work-type></record></records></xml>