<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jordan M. Herman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Vanina D. Fiorini</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ignacio Crudele</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Juan C. Reboreda</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Shawn A. Pladas</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">André P. Watson</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sarah E. Bush</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Clayton,Dale H.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Co‐parasitism in the face of predation: Effects of natural enemies on a neotropical mockingbird</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Journl of Animal Ecology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">brood parasitism</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">coinfection</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Community ecology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">host–parasite interactions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">natural enemies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">nest predation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Philornis nest flies</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">shiny cowbirds</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2023</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Aug-15-2023</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">https://besjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1365-2656.13991</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">92</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1992-2004</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&lt;jats title=&quot;&quot;&gt;Abstract&lt;/jats&gt;&lt;jats p=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;jats list=&quot;&quot;&gt; &lt;jats list-item=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;jats p=&quot;&quot;&gt;Co‐parasitism is ubiquitous and has important consequences for the ecology and evolution of wild host populations. Studies of parasite co‐infections remain limited in scope, with few experimental tests of the fitness consequences of multiple parasites, especially in natural populations.&lt;/jats&gt;&lt;/jats&gt; &lt;jats list-item=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;jats p=&quot;&quot;&gt;We measured the separate and combined effects of &lt;jats italic=&quot;&quot;&gt;Philornis seguyi&lt;/jats&gt; nest flies and shiny cowbirds &lt;jats italic=&quot;&quot;&gt;Molothrus bonariensis&lt;/jats&gt; on the fitness of a shared host, the chalk‐browed mockingbird (&lt;jats italic=&quot;&quot;&gt;Mimus saturninus&lt;/jats&gt;) in Argentina.&lt;/jats&gt;&lt;/jats&gt; &lt;jats list-item=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;jats p=&quot;&quot;&gt;Using a two‐factor experimental approach, we manipulated the presence of nest flies and cowbirds in mockingbird nests and assessed their effects on mockingbird haemoglobin levels, begging and provisioning rates, body size, and fledging success. We also monitored rates of nest predation in relation to parasitism by flies and cowbirds.&lt;/jats&gt;&lt;/jats&gt; &lt;jats list-item=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;jats p=&quot;&quot;&gt;Nest flies reduced the haemoglobin concentration, body size, and fledging success of mockingbirds, likely because mockingbirds did not compensate for parasitism by begging more or feeding their nestlings more. Cowbirds also reduced the fledging success of mockingbirds, even though they had no detectable effect on haemoglobin or body size. Nests with cowbirds, which beg more than mockingbirds, attracted more nest predators. There was no significant interaction between the effects of flies and cowbirds on any component of mockingbird fitness. The combined effects of nest flies and cowbirds were strictly additive.&lt;/jats&gt;&lt;/jats&gt; &lt;jats list-item=&quot;&quot;&gt;&lt;jats p=&quot;&quot;&gt;In summary, we show that nest flies and cowbirds both reduce host fitness, but do not have interactive effects in co‐parasitized nests. Our results further suggest that predators exacerbate the effects of nest flies and cowbirds on their hosts. Our study shows that the fitness consequences of co‐parasitism are complex, especially in the context of community‐level interactions.&lt;/jats&gt;&lt;/jats&gt; &lt;/jats&gt; &lt;/jats&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">10</style></issue></record></records></xml>