@inbook {96062, title = {Phthiraptera}, booktitle = {Princ{\'\i}pios B{\'a}sicos de Entomologia M{\'e}dica}, year = {2021}, pages = {500-563}, publisher = {Caule de Papiro}, organization = {Caule de Papiro}, edition = {I}, chapter = {13}, address = {Natal}, abstract = {

The chapter cover most of the aspects of the life cycle, morphology, diversity, and collection methods of the louse species with medical interest. We also provide a list and a pictorial key of the common species found on animals with medical-veterinary interests. Unfortunately, at some point in the editorial process, the tables and scientific names got unformatted. The book is in Portuguese.

}, url = {https://www.researchgate.net/publication/349900046_Phthiraptera}, author = {Kamila M. D. Kuabara and Michel Paiva Valim}, editor = {de Almeida_Andrade, Herbet Tadeu and Serpa-Filho,A.} } @article {95535, title = {Lice and Fleas (Phthiraptera and Siphonaptera). Chapter 13.4 in Alien terrestrial arthropods of Europe}, journal = {BioRisk}, volume = {4}, year = {2010}, month = {Jul-06-2010}, pages = {833-849}, abstract = {

A total of 31 Phthiraptera species alien to Europe are listed. They include 24 chewing lice and seven sucking lice of 12 different families. The families Goniodidae (Ischnocera) and Menoponidae (Amblycera) largely dominate the alien entomofauna of chewing lice. Asia is the major supplier of alien Phthiraptera which are mostly associated with poultry farming, game birds, guinea pigs and invasive alien mammals. The recent period did not show any acceleration in alien arrival in Europe. Alien fleas include six species in the families Pulicidae and Ceratophyllidae. Three of them are primarily associated with rats and are capable of transmiting major human diseases such as the bubonic plague and the murine typhus.

}, issn = {1313-2652, 1313-2644}, doi = {10.3897/biorisk.4.65}, url = {https://biorisk.pensoft.net/articles.php?id=1867}, author = {Marc Kenis and Alain Roques} } @article {43018, title = {Parasites of animals in the Netherlands}, journal = {Tijdschrift Voor Diergeneeskunde}, volume = {84}, year = {1959}, note = {1231}, month = {08/1959}, pages = {892 - 900}, keywords = {Anoplura, Artiodactyla, Carnivora, Echinophthirius horridus, Europe, Haematopinus eurysternus, Haemodipsus ventricosus, Lagomorpha, Linognathus stenopsis, lyriocephalus, Pinnipedia, Polyplax spinulosa, Rodentia., serrata, Solenopotes, suis. Linognathus setosus, Troester}, url = {http://phthiraptera.info/sites/phthiraptera.info/files/43018.pdf}, author = {Swierstra,D. and Jansen,J.,Jr. and Broek,E. van den} } @article {40509, title = {Contributions towards a monograph of the sucking lice. Part V}, journal = {Stanford University Publications, University Series, Biological Sciences}, volume = {2}, year = {1932}, note = {Note that the title of this publication was altered between part I and part II. Part I was published in the series "Leland Stanford Junior University Publications, University Series", without volume or part numbers and each part pages separately. In part, this series became "Stanford University Publications, University Series, Biological Sicences", with volume and part numbers. Note that part 1 is dated 1919, but was published in 1920. Taxa covered are as followed: Justrification for the seperation of the following genera from the genus Enderleinellus: Hoplophthirus, Cyclophthirus, Rhinophthirus, Euenderleinellus Justrification for the seperation of the following genera from the genus Hoplopleura: Pterophthirus (a note is provided on Pterophthirus alata and Pterophthirus audax), Ctenura, Euhoplopleura, Ctenopleura, Ferrisella Justrification for the seperation of the following genera from the genus Polyplax and Neohaematopinus: Ahaematopinus A note is povided on Acanthophthirius Perkins and Haematopinus Piaget that have erroniously been refered to as Anoplura. The following taxa are considered: Hoplopleura (cont.) Hoplopleura acanthopus (Burm.) (cont.) Scipio (cont.) Scipio tripedatus n. sp. ex Petromys typicus tropicalis Enderleinellus (cont.) Enderleinellus tamiasis Fahrenholz Haematopinoides Haematopinoides squamosus Osborn Neohaematopinus (cont.) Neohaematopinus sciurinus Mjobergi (cont.) Neohaematopinus pectinifer (Neumann) (cont.) Neohaematopinus faurei (Bedford) Phthirpediculus Phthirpediculus propitheci Ewing Lemurphthirus Lemurphthirus galagus Bedford Docophthirus Docophthirus acinetus Waterston Hamophthirus Hamophthirus galeopitheci Mjobergi Ancistroplax Ancistroplax crocidurae Waterston Bathyergicola Bathyergicola hilli Bedford Bathyergicola lawrensis Bedford Bathyergicola lophiomydis n. sp. ex Lophiomys thomasi Eulinognathus denticulatus Cummings Eulinognathus aculeatus (Neumann) Eulinognathus biuncatus n. sp.Dipodipus sowerbyi Eulinognathus americanus Ewing Eulinognathus parvus (Kellogg and Ferris) Haemodipsus Haemodipsus lyriocephalus (Burmeister) Haemodipsus ventricosus (Denny) Haemodipsus setoni Ewing Linognathus Linognathus setosus (Olfers) Linognathus pedalis (Osborn) Linognathus ovillus (Neumann) Linognathus stenopsis (Burmeister) Linognathus africanus Kellogg and Paine Linognathus oviformis (Rudow) Linognathus saccatus (Gervais) Linognathus vituli (Linnaeus) Linognathus tibialis (Piaget) Linognathus cervicaprae (Lucas) Linognathus brevicornis Giebel Linognathus fractus n. sp. Tragelaphus sylvaticus Linognathus gnu Bedford Linognathus fahrenholzi Paine Linognathus hippotragi n. sp. Hippotragus niger Linognathus taurotragus Bedford Linognathus breviceps (Piaget) Linognathus angulatus (Piaget) Linognathus gazella Mjobergi Linognathus limnotragi Cummings Linognathus pithodes Cummings Linognathus bedfordi n. sp. Antidorcas marsupialis Linognathus spicatus n. sp. Gorgon taurinus Microthoracius Microthoracius praelongiceps (Neumann) Microthoracius cameli (Linnaeus) Solenopotes Solenopotes capillatus Enderlein Solenopotes binipilosus (Fahrenholzia) Solenopotes ferrisi (Fahrenholzia) Solenopotes tarandi (Mjoberg) Solenopotes burmeisteri (Fahrenholzia) Prolinognathus Prolinognathus caviae-capensis (Cummings) Prolinognathus leptocephalus (Ehrenbergi) Descriptions are thorough and well figured.}, month = {1932}, pages = {271 - 413}, keywords = {atax}, url = {https://phthiraptera.myspecies.info/sites/phthiraptera.info/files/3302.pdf}, author = {Ferris,Gordon Floyd} } @article {40095, title = {Louse and mite infestation in domestic animals in northern Nigeria}, journal = {Tropical Animal Health and Production}, volume = {24}, year = {1992}, month = {1992}, pages = {121 - 124}, abstract = {

Records of domestic animals brought to the Veterinary Entomology Laboratory for diagnosis of suspected lice and mite infestation over a 10 year period were analysed. From a total of 794 suspected cases, 137 (17.3\%) and 247 (31.1\%) were positive for lice and mange mites respectively. The most common lice species recorded were Linognathus vituli (66.7\%) on cattle, L. ovillus (83.3\%) on sheep, Haematopinus suis (100\%) on pigs and Menacanthus stramineus (54.5\%) on poultry. Other lice species recorded included Haematopinus bovis and Solenopotes capillatus on cattle, Damalinia ovis on sheep, Linognathus stenopsis and Menacanthus stramineus on goats, Goniocotes sp. on a horse, Linognathus setosus and Menacanthus stramineus on dogs, Goniodes gigas, Lipeurus caponis, Menopon gallinae and Chelopistes meleagrides on poultry. The most common mite species were Demodex folliculorum on cattle (96.9\%) and on dogs (80.8\%), Sarcoptes scabiei on pigs (100\%) and Notoedres cati (80.3\%) on rabbits. Other mite species included Psoroptes communis, Cheyletiella parasitivorax, Ornithonyssus gallinae and Dermanyssus gallinae.

Resumen

Se analizaron los registros de animales dom\ésticos llevados al Laboratorio de Entomolog\ís Veterinaria, para diagn\óstico de posible infestaci\ón con piojos y \ácaros, durante un per\íodo de 10 a\ños. De un total de 794 casos sospechosos, 137 (17\·3\%) y 247 (31\·1\%) fueron positivos para piojos y \ácaros, respectivamente. Las especies m\ás comunes de piojos encontradas fueronLinognathus vituli (66\·7\%) en ganado,L. ovillus (83\·3\%) en ovejas,Haematopinus suis (100\%) en cerdos yMenacanthus stramineus (54\·5\%) en aves. Otras especies de piojos encontradas incluyeron,Haematopinus bovis ySolenopotes capillatus en ganado;Damalinia ovis en ovejas;Linognathus stenopsis yMenacanthus stramineus en cabras;Ganiocotes sp. en caballos;Linognathus setosus yMenacanthus stramineus en perros;Goniodes gigas, Lipeurus caponis, Menopon gallinae yChelopistes meleagrides en aves.

Las especies m\ás com\únes de \ácaros fueron,Demodex folliculorum en ganado (96\·9\%) y en perros (80\·8\%);Sarcoptes scabiei en cerdos (100\%) yNotoedres cati (80\·3\%) en conejos. Otras especies detectadas incluyeron,Psoroptes comunis, Cheyletiella parasitivorax, Ornithonyssus gallinae yDermanyssus gallinae.

}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02356957}, author = {George,J. B. D. and Otobo,S. and Ogunleye,J. and Adediminiyi,B.} }