02502nam a2200265   4500008004100000020004800041245003300089210003300122260003200155520177300187653000901960653002301969653001701992653001602009653001602025653001702041653000902058653000902067653001302076653001602089100002202105700002002127700002302147856006602170       2015                        eng d  a9780226302270, 9780226302133, 978022630230000aCoevolution of Life on Hosts0 aCoevolution of Life on Hosts  bUniversity of Chicago Press3 a<p>This book provides an introduction to coevolution in both microevolutionary (ecological) and macroevolutionary (historical) time. It emphasizes the integration of cophylogenetic, comparative, and experimental approaches for testing coevolutionary hypotheses. Recent work in coevolutionary biology has been successful in demonstrating coadaptation between species in response to reciprocal selection. Fewer studies have tested the influence of coadaptation on the diversification of interacting taxa. We review studies that have attempted to do just this. The overriding question addressed is &ldquo;how do ecological interactions influence patterns of codiversification?&rdquo;. We focus on the coevolution of interacting species, particularly those involving external parasites that live on hosts. Such parasites include a diverse assemblage of organisms, ranging from herbivorous insects on plants, to monogenean worms on fish, to feather lice on birds. Ectoparasites are powerful models for studies of coevolution because they are easy to observe, mark, and count. Many of the examples in the book involve parasitic lice of birds and mammals. Lice and their hosts are unusually tractable systems for studies that attempt to integrate coevolutionary ecology and history. Some chapters in the book are very broad in scope, introducing coevolutionary concepts that apply to all interacting species. Other chapters are more narrowly focused on the biology and coevolution of lice and their hosts. The overall goal of the book is to integrate coevolutionary concepts with examples of empirical tests of coevolutionary theory in micro- and macro-evolutionary time. The book concludes with a framework for better integration of coadaptation and codiversification.</p>
10abird10aco-diversification10acoadaptation10acoevolution10acompetition10acospeciation10ahost10alice10aparasite10aspecificity1 aClayton, Dale, H.1 aBush, Sarah, E.1 aJohnson, Kevin, P.  uhttps://www.bibliovault.org/BV.landing.epl?ISBN=978022630230002331nas a2200229   4500008004100000245007300041210006900114260000900183300001600192490000700208520165600215653001501871653001701886653000901903653001901912653001301931653001701944653001601961100002201977700002301999856007902022       2003                        eng d00aLinking coevolutionary history to ecological process: Doves and lice0 aLinking coevolutionary history to ecological process Doves and l  c2003  a2335 - 23410 v573 a<p>Abstract. &mdash; Many host-specific parasites are restricted to a limited range of host species by ecological barriers that impede dispersal and successful establishment. In some cases, microevolutionary differentiation is apparent on top of host specificity, as evidenced by significant parasite population genetic structure among host populations. Ecological barriers responsible for specificity and genetic structure can, in principle, reinforce macroevolutionary processes that generate congruent host-parasite phylogenies. However, few studies have explored both the micro- and macroevolutionary ramifications of close association in a single host-parasite system. Here we compare the macroevolutionary histories of two genera of feather lice (Phthiraptera: Ischnocera) that both parasitize New World pigeons and doves (Aves: Columbiformes). Earlier work has shown that dove body lice (genus Physconelloides) are more host specific and have greater population genetic structure than dove wing lice (Columbicola). We reconstructed phylogenies for representatives of the two genera of lice and their hosts, using nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences. The phylogenies were well resolved and generally well supported. We compared the phylogenies of body lice and wing lice to the host phylogeny using reconciliation analyses. We found that dove body lice show strong evidence of cospeciation whereas dove wing lice do not. Although the ecology of body and wing lice is very similar, differences in their dispersal ability may underlie these joint differences in host specificity, population genetic structure, and coevolutionary history.</p>
10aColumbidae10acospeciation10ahost10amacroevolution10aparasite10aPhthiraptera10aspecificity1 aClayton, Dale, H.1 aJohnson, Kevin, P.  uhttps://phthiraptera.myspecies.info/sites/phthiraptera.info/files/6691.pdf