01857nas a2200277 4500008004100000022002500041245006800066210006500134260001500199300001200214490000700226520101000233653001601243653001701259653001801276653002101294653002501315653002301340653001901363653002801382100002601410700002501436700002101461700002401482856007301506 2010 eng d a1461-023X, 1461-024800aParasites lost - do invaders miss the boat or drown on arrival?0 aParasites lost do invaders miss the boat or drown on arrival cMarch 2010 a516-5270 v133 a

Host species that colonize new regions often lose parasite species. Using population arrival and establishment data for New Zealand’s introduced bird species and their ectoparasitic chewing lice species, we test the relative importance of different processes and mechanisms in causing parasite species loss. Few lice failed to arrive in New Zealand with their hosts due to being missed by chance in the sample of hosts from the original population (missing the boat). Rather, most lice were absent because their hosts or the parasite themselves failed to establish populations in their new environment. Given they arrived and their host established, parasite persistence was more strongly related to factors associated with transmission efficiency (number of host individuals introduced, host body size, host sociality and parasite suborder) than parasite propagule pressure and aggregation. Such insights into parasite success are invaluable to both understanding and managing their impact

10aaggregation10aChewing lice10aectoparasites10aintroduced birds10aintroduction success10apropagule pressure10asorting events10atransmission efficiency1 aMacLeod, Catriona, J.1 aPaterson, Adrian, M.1 aTompkins, D., M.1 aDuncan, Richard, P. uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01446.x01546nas a2200217 4500008004100000022001400041245006600055210006500121260001200186300001400198490000800212520091300220653001701133653001801150653002101168653001601189100002601205700002401231700001801255856005501273 2010 eng d a0029-854900aEctoparasites, uropygial glands and hatching success in birds0 aEctoparasites uropygial glands and hatching success in birds c06-2010 a303 - 3110 v1633 a

The uropygial gland of birds secretes wax that is applied to the plumage, where the secretions are hypothe- sized to eliminate fungi and bacteria, thereby potentially providing important beneWts in terms of plumage mainte- nance. We analyzed variation in size of the uropygial gland in 212 species of birds to determine the function and the ecological correlates of variation in gland size. Bird species with larger uropygial glands had more genera of chewing lice of the sub-order Amblycera, but not of the sub-order Ischnocera, and more feather mites. There was a Wtness advantage associated with relatively large uropygial glands because such species had higher hatching suc- cess. These Wndings are consistent with the hypothesis that the uropygial gland functions to manage the community of microorganisms, and that certain taxa of chewing lice have diverged as a consequence of these defenses.

10aChewing lice10afeather mites10aHatching success10aPreen gland1 aMøller, Anders, Pape1 aErritzøe, Johannes1 aRózsa, Lajos uhttp://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00442-009-1548-x02682nas a2200193 4500008004100000245010900041210010700150300001400257490000700271520199700278653002002275653001002295653001702305653001902322653002202341100002102363700001802384856008602402 2010 eng d00aПУХОЕДЫ (MALLOPHAGA) INSECTA НА ПТИЦАХ В ЦЕНТРАЛЬНОМ ПРЕДКАВКАЗЬЕ0 aПУХОЕДЫ MALLOPHAGA INSECTA НА ПТИЦАХ В ЦЕНТРАЛЬНОМ ПРЕДКАВКАЗЬЕ a461 - 4740 v443 a

Аннотация: Обработаны сборы 8805 особей пухоедов с диких и домашних птиц в Централь- ном Предкавказье. По собственным и литературным данным, общее число видов Mal- lophaga, известных с этой территории, — 102; из них 15 видов обнаружено здесь нами впервые. Из всех известных на этой территории видов пухоедов наибольшее число видов приходится на паразитов воробьинообразных, в несколько раз меньше видов насекомых, связанных с каждым из 12 других отрядов птиц. Возможен обмен пухо- едами между некоторыми видами хозяев, в том числе между домашними и дикими птицами.
Кчючевые слова: видовое разнообразие, пухоеды, птицы, основной хозяин, слу- чайный хозяин.

English title: CHEWING LICE (MALLOPHAGA) ON BIRDS IN THE CENTRAL CISCAUCASIA

Abstract: Mallophaga parasitizing wild and domestic birds in the Central Ciscaucasia were studi- ed; 8805 chewing lice specimens were collected and identified. At present, 102 species of Mallophaga are known from this territory, including 15 species recorded in the Central Ciscaucasia for the first time. Most of the chewing lice species in the region under study are parasites of Passeriformes. Species diversity of chewing lice connected with each of ot- her 12 bird orders is several times lesser. The exchange of chewing lice between some spe- cies of hosts, particularly between domestic and wild birds, seems possible.

10aaccidental host10abirds10aChewing lice10aprincipal host10aspecies diversity1 aLyakhova, O., M.1 aKotti, B., K. uhttps://www.zin.ru/journals/parazitologiya/content/2010/prz_2010_5_8_Lyakhova.pdf