| Publication Type: | Journal Article |
| Year of Publication: | 2020 |
| Authors: | L. Norman Gillman, Wright S. Donald |
| Journal: | Communications Biology |
| Volume: | 3 |
| Issue: | 609 |
| Pagination: | 3 pp |
| Date Published: | Oct-2020 |
| Type of Article: | Open Access |
| ISSN: | 2399-3642 |
| Keywords: | Plant Sciences, Scientific community, Zoology |
| Abstract: | Some pillars of scientific practice appear immutable. We propose that one of these needs more thorough consideration and modification: this being the longstanding emphasis in nomenclature for first published names over pre-existing indigenous names, in accepting species epithets. We suggest that biologists reevaluate this practice, in the context of a current more general re-evaluation of indigenous knowledge. We propose that it is now time to critically examine taxonomic protocols in favour of both assigning and reinstating indigenous names whenever possible. A response to the article see: Palma & Heath (2021), Science versus vernacular: should some taxa of animals and plants be renamed according to ‘indigenous’ practices?, Bionomina 22, 1-7. https://www.mapress.com/bn/article/view/bionomina.22.1.1 or https://phthiraptera.myspecies.info/node/95431 |
| URL: | https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-020-01344-y |
| DOI: | 10.1038/s42003-020-01344-y |
Restoring indigenous names in taxonomy
File attachments: